Why not single ring ? Well.... single is simpler and better for the rough stuff, but in the case of a do-it-all bike, if you want to do some "fast" road riding as well, double is still a nice thing to have, as you have more gear range with smaller gaps.
(Not going into why oval right now, as that is topic for a whole new post eventually)
So, in this case, paired with a 11-34 SLX cassette, the resulting gear range comes to:
CLIMBING - 32 / 34 - with 700c-40mm tires
How fast will I be going at 50-90 rpm in these gears?
Cadence Gear | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | Cadence Gear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
32x34 | 6.22 | 7.46 | 8.71 | 9.95 | 11.19 | 32x34 |
This basically means that for climbing cadences on extreme gradients, I have a gear that allows me to climb at 7 km/h and keep turning the pedals.
Should be enough for all things, as lower than 6 km/h you are better off walking anyway.
Max Speed - 48 / 11 -with 700c-40mm tires
How fast will I be going at 80-110 rpm in these gears?
Cadence Gear | 80 | 90 | 100 | 110 | Cadence Gear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
48x11 | 46.15 | 51.92 | 57.69 | 63.46 | 48x11 |
I don't have the power to ride at more than that, unless it is a steep descent, and in that case you are probably better off coasting and aero-tucking anyway.
Full-range of the gears is like below.
(Note this is a cheap MTB cassette, so not much optimization done for road/gravel purposes).
How fast will I be going at 80-110 rpm in these gears?
Cadence Gear | 80 | 90 | 100 | 110 | Cadence Gear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
32x11 | 30.80 | 34.66 | 38.51 | 42.36 | 32x11 |
32x13 | 26.04 | 29.30 | 32.55 | 35.81 | 32x13 |
32x15 | 22.55 | 25.37 | 28.18 | 31.00 | 32x15 |
32x17 | 19.90 | 22.39 | 24.88 | 27.36 | 32x17 |
32x19 | 17.78 | 20.01 | 22.23 | 24.45 | 32x19 |
32x21 | 16.09 | 18.10 | 20.11 | 22.12 | 32x21 |
32x23 | 14.71 | 16.55 | 18.39 | 20.23 | 32x23 |
32x26 | 13.02 | 14.65 | 16.28 | 17.90 | 32x26 |
32x30 | 11.33 | 12.74 | 14.16 | 15.57 | 32x30 |
32x34 | 9.95 | 11.19 | 12.44 | 13.68 | 32x34 |
48x11 | 46.15 | 51.92 | 57.69 | 63.46 | 48x11 |
48x13 | 39.06 | 43.94 | 48.83 | 53.71 | 48x13 |
48x15 | 33.87 | 38.11 | 42.34 | 46.58 | 48x15 |
48x17 | 29.85 | 33.58 | 37.32 | 41.05 | 48x17 |
48x19 | 26.78 | 30.13 | 33.48 | 36.83 | 48x19 |
48x21 | 24.24 | 27.27 | 30.30 | 33.33 | 48x21 |
48x23 | 22.12 | 24.89 | 27.66 | 30.42 | 48x23 |
48x26 | 19.58 | 22.03 | 24.48 | 26.93 | 48x26 |
48x30 | 16.94 | 19.05 | 21.17 | 23.29 | 48x30 |
48x34 | 14.93 | 16.79 | 18.66 | 20.52 | 48x34 |
Translating the table, this is the speed you will be going in a given gear @ a given cadence.
In the above examples, you can use the tools at BikeCalc.com to check if you will have a low enough/high enough gear for your riding.
In this example, I created a table with every combination to check the gear steps.
To ilustrate this, check the 33 km/h speed highlighted in red. This is a common speed for road group riding etc, so a good example on this. Looking at the table you can see that with this gears, I am able to ride at 33km/h at all of my cadence range, from 80 (or even less, just not plotted) to 110, there is a gear that you can use.
You can also see, that each gear change will affect cadence by around 10 rpm.
(same 10rpm can be seen at 30km/h, 27km/h, etc, just check diagonal lines in the table)
If I change from the 17 to the 19 in the back, my legs will need to spin from 90 to 100 rpm to match the speed.
10 rpms is well within my cadence range, so I not caught in an awkward cadence if I up or downshift.
No comments:
Post a Comment